65.7 F
Houston
Thursday, May 7, 2026

Home Blog Page 504

Pamela Anderson hace otra aparición sin maquillaje en la alfombra roja de los Fashion Awards 2023

El ícono de la moda ha estado abrazando su belleza natural durante sus apariciones públicas.

Pamela Anderson muestra su belleza natural.

Anderson, de 56 años, hizo una aparición sin maquillaje en los Fashion Awards 2023 en Londres el lunes. La actriz y modelo apareció en la alfombra roja vestida con un conjunto completamente blanco que constaba de un par de pantalones anchos, una camiseta holgada y una chaqueta color crema sobre sus hombros.

La modelo combinó el look con pequeños aretes plateados. Su rostro fue el centro de atención mientras llevaba el cabello recogido en una cola de caballo baja, lo que mostraba la belleza descarada que le valió los titulares por primera vez cuando asistió a la Semana de la Moda de París con ropa de alta costura pero sin maquillaje.

Gareth Cattermole/Getty Una vista completa del atuendo de Pamela Anderson en los Fashion Awards 2023

En un video detrás de escena del ícono de estilo vistiéndose para el desfile de Vivienne Westwood en la Semana de la Moda de París, publicado por Vogue Francia, Anderson explicó por qué decidió no maquillarse.

Relacionado: Pamela Anderson habla de su momento sin maquillaje que está provocando un movimiento: ‘Es una liberación’

“No lo sé, algo se apoderó de mí y me estaba vistiendo con esta ropa hermosa y pensé: ‘No quiero competir con la ropa. No estoy tratando de ser la chica más bonita'”. en la habitación. Siento que es simplemente libertad. Es una liberación”, dijo. La estrella de Baywatch señaló que estaba desarrollando su nueva apariencia y estilo por su cuenta.

“No necesito un estilista. No tengo un estilista. No tengo un equipo glamoroso. Simplemente hago esto, estilo libre”, agregó Anderson. Explicó que quería ser modelo en todos los aspectos de la belleza.

‘A Charlie Brown Christmas’ no se emitirá en televisión este año. Aquí es donde puedes verlo.

Charlie Brown y la pandilla “Peanuts” han sido una parte colectiva de nuestras vacaciones desde que “A Charlie Brown Christmas” debutó por primera vez en 1965.
Desde entonces, ver el especial animado se ha convertido en una querida tradición navideña para muchas familias, y con razón.
El mensaje atemporal de amor y el verdadero significado de la temporada de la clásica película navideña aún logra hacer llorar a Charlie, Lucy, Sally, Linus y el resto de los niños se reúnen alrededor del árbol y cantan “Hark the Herald Angels Sing”. “.
Y hablando del árbol de Navidad de Charlie Brown, no hay duda, se ha ganado un lugar permanente en nuestros corazones.
Si la película navideña está en su lista de seguimiento este año y se pregunta dónde transmitir “A Charlie Brown Christmas”, debe saber desde el principio que las cosas han cambiado desde los días en que el especial se transmitía anualmente en las cadenas y la televisión pública. Desafortunadamente, tampoco lo encontrarás en Netflix, Hulu o Disney.
Solo hay un lugar para ver “A Charlie Brown Christmas” en 2023 y tenemos los detalles sobre cómo y dónde verlo gratis este año, junto con algunas curiosidades divertidas sobre el especial de Navidad que te ayudarán a llenar tu taza. un poco más de alegría navideña.

Dónde ver ‘La Navidad de Charlie Brown’

En 2023, el único lugar para ver “A Charlie Brown Christmas” será en Apple TV+.

En 2018, Apple adquirió los derechos de “A Charlie Brown Christmas”, junto con el resto del catálogo de “Peanuts”, incluidos otros clásicos como “It’s the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown” y “A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving”.

Para ver el especial de televisión animado de este año, necesitarás una suscripción a Apple TV+. Dicho esto, el servicio de transmisión ofrecerá a los no suscriptores una ventana gratuita para ver “A Charlie Brown Christmas” y tenemos los detalles a continuación.

Cómo ver ‘Una Navidad de Charlie Brown’ gratis en 2023

Afortunadamente, incluso si no tienes una suscripción a Apple TV+, aún puedes ver “A Charlie Brown Christmas” cuando Apple ofrece a los no suscriptores una ventana gratuita para transmitir el especial.

En 2023, esa ventana ocurre el sábado 16 de diciembre y el domingo 17 de diciembre.

Si no puedes verlo ese fin de semana, aún puedes ver “A Charlie Brown Christmas” registrándote en la prueba gratuita de 7 días de Apple TV+.

Meta desconectará el chat de Messenger e Instagram a finales de este mes

Meta no dijo por qué, pero la Ley de Mercados Digitales de la UE podría ser la culpable.

Meta pronto eliminará una función que te permite chatear con amigos de Facebook en Instagram. A partir de mediados de diciembre, la compañía desconectará la integración multiplataforma, que agregó en 2020. No proporcionó una razón para hacerlo, pero, como especula 9to5Google, evitar las consecuencias regulatorias en la UE parece un motivo lógico.

Anunciada en 2019, la integración multiplataforma opcional entró en funcionamiento un año después, borrando las líneas entre dos de los servicios más populares de la empresa. “Al igual que hoy puedes hablar con una cuenta de Gmail si tienes una cuenta de Yahoo, estas cuentas podrán hablar entre sí a través del protocolo compartido que es Messenger”, dijo en ese momento la vicepresidenta de Messenger, Loredena Crisan.

Meta dice que una vez que llegue “mediados de diciembre de 2023”, ya no podrás iniciar nuevos chats o llamadas con amigos de Facebook desde Instagram. Si tiene conversaciones existentes con cuentas de Facebook en Instagram, serán de solo lectura. Además, las cuentas de Facebook ya no podrán ver el estado de su actividad ni ver los recibos de lectura. Finalmente, los chats existentes con cuentas de Facebook no se trasladarán a su bandeja de entrada en ninguna de las plataformas.

La UE diseñó su histórica Ley de Mercados Digitales, aprobada en 2022, como un elemento disuasorio para que los titulares de plataformas obtengan poder de monopolio (o algo parecido). Si una empresa supera un umbral de ingresos y la Comisión Europea considera que la plataforma es demasiado dominante, puede imponer una multa máxima del 10 por ciento de su facturación global total del año anterior. Dado el “garrote” de aplicación que esto proporciona al organismo rector, tal vez Meta vio la escritura en la pared y consideró que la función de mensajería cruzada de Instagram/Facebook no valía la pena correr el riesgo.

Se culpa a Charged Lemonade de Panera Bread de una segunda muerte, según alega la demanda

Dennis Brown, de 46 años, bebió tres de las bebidas con alto contenido de cafeína antes de sufrir un paro cardíaco en octubre, según la demanda.

Ahora se culpa a la limonada cargada con alto contenido de cafeína de Panera Bread por una segunda muerte, según una demanda presentada el lunes.

Dennis Brown, de Fleming Island, Florida, bebió tres limonadas cargadas de una Panera local el 9 de octubre y luego sufrió un paro cardíaco fatal en su camino a casa, dice la demanda.

Brown, de 46 años, tenía un trastorno de deficiencia cromosómica no especificada, un retraso en el desarrollo y una discapacidad intelectual leve. Vivía de forma independiente y paraba con frecuencia en Panera después de sus turnos en un supermercado, dice la denuncia legal. Debido a que padecía hipertensión arterial, no consumía bebidas energéticas, añade.

La demanda se presentó en nombre de la madre, la hermana y el hermano de Brown menos de dos meses después de que Panera recibiera una demanda separada sobre Sarah Katz, una estudiante de la Ivy League con una enfermedad cardíaca que murió en septiembre de 2022 después de beber una limonada cargada. Esa demanda, reportada por primera vez por NBC News, calificó la bebida como una “bebida energética peligrosa” y argumentó que Panera no advirtió adecuadamente a los consumidores sobre sus ingredientes, que incluyen el estimulante extracto de guaraná.

Panera ha anunciado su limonada cargada como “de origen vegetal y limpia con tanta cafeína como nuestro café tostado oscuro”. Con 390 miligramos de cafeína, una gran limonada cargada de 30 onzas líquidas tiene más cafeína en total que cualquier tamaño de café tostado oscuro de Panera, dicen las demandas legales. La taza grande contiene más que el contenido de cafeína de las latas estándar de bebidas energéticas Red Bull y Monster combinadas, además del equivalente a casi 30 cucharaditas de azúcar, dicen las quejas.

La Administración de Alimentos y Medicamentos dice que los adultos sanos pueden consumir de manera segura 400 miligramos de cafeína al día.

Brown había consumido Charged Lemonades en los días previos a su muerte, según la demanda por muerte por negligencia del lunes, que se presentó en Delaware, donde está constituida Panera.

No está claro si Brown sabía cuánta cafeína y otros estimulantes había en la bebida, que en el momento de su muerte estaba disponible en dispensadores de autoservicio y “se ofrecía junto con todas las bebidas sin cafeína y/o de la tienda”. bebidas con menos cafeína”, dice la demanda.

La causa de la muerte de Brown fue un paro cardíaco debido a una enfermedad hipertensiva, según un certificado de defunción proporcionado a NBC News por Elizabeth Crawford, socia del bufete de abogados Kline & Specter, PC con sede en Filadelfia, que representa tanto a la familia de Brown como a la familia de Katz.

Panera dijo que expresaba “nuestro profundo pésame por la familia del Sr. Brown” y que defendía la seguridad de sus productos.

“Basándonos en nuestra investigación, creemos que su desafortunado fallecimiento no fue causado por uno de los productos de la empresa”, dijo en un comunicado. “Consideramos que esta demanda, que fue presentada por el mismo bufete de abogados que una reclamación anterior, tampoco tiene fundamento. Panera defiende firmemente la seguridad de nuestros productos”.

Texas Senate Approves $800 Million School Safety Bill Amid Ongoing Special Legislative Session

In the midst of the fourth special legislative session of the year, Texas lawmakers are addressing school safety concerns, with the Senate unanimously passing Senate Bill 5 on December 1. Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick noted the unusual December session, emphasizing the nine months lawmakers have spent at the Capitol this year.

Authored by Sen. Joan Huffman, R-Houston, SB 5 aims to allocate $800 million for school safety funding, emphasizing a grant program to aid school districts in hiring armed guards. This move comes after months of Republican-led debates on various issues, including property tax cuts, border security, private school vouchers, and public school funding.

While SB 5 awaits its fate in the Texas House, which already passed its school safety proposal, House Bill 2, on November 17, uncertainties loom over the legislative landscape. HB 2 proposes two new school safety grants totaling nearly $1.3 billion annually and seeks voter approval in a future election.

Sen. Huffman underscores SB 5’s commitment to enhancing school safety, creating a grant program to assist public school districts and charter schools in meeting the requirements set by HB 3, a law from the regular legislative session. HB 3 mandates schools to have at least one armed security officer on campus during regular school hours and went into effect on September 1. Some schools have sought exemptions, citing financial constraints in hiring new law enforcement officers.

SB 5 specifically allocates $400 million for schools to hire armed officers during the 2024-25 biennium, with provisions for future reallocation of funds. Additionally, the bill proposes doubling the state funding requirement for schools, providing each campus with a $30,000 allotment and $20 per student, incurring an estimated cost of an additional $400 million.

Huffman characterizes the proposal as an “immediate response to the needs of our school districts.” As both legislative chambers are scheduled to convene next week, questions remain about the potential for a fifth special session, with Governor Greg Abbott yet to confirm additional sessions to address school safety and other education matters.

Former US Diplomat Charged as Cuban Agent for Over 40 Years in Historic Security Breach Case

0

A former US diplomat, Victor Manuel Rocha, who served as ambassador to Bolivia, has been charged with acting as an agent for the Cuban government for over four decades. The 73-year-old is accused of aiding Cuba in gathering intelligence against the United States since 1981, referring to the US as “the enemy” and asserting that his clandestine work “strengthened the Revolution,” according to court documents.

Arrested in Miami last Friday after a year-long undercover operation, Rocha’s case is described by Attorney General Merrick Garland as “one of the highest-reaching and longest-lasting infiltrations” of the US government by a foreign agent. Born in Colombia and raised in New York City, Rocha, who served as ambassador to Bolivia from 1999 to 2002, has degrees from Yale, Harvard, and Georgetown. He held various government positions, including at the National Security Council, during a 25-year career in public service.

The US and Cuba, with a tumultuous relationship since Fidel Castro’s overthrow of a US-backed government over 60 years ago, have faced political challenges. Rocha’s alleged actions occurred amid changing dynamics, including the US trade embargo against Cuba in the 1960s and later efforts by Barack Obama and Raul Castro to normalize relations in 2015.

Court documents reveal that Rocha made multiple trips to Cuba, allegedly advancing Cuban officials’ interests from 1981 to the present. The charges outline an undercover FBI operation, initiated when an agent contacted Rocha via WhatsApp in November 2022, posing as a representative of Cuban Intelligence Services.

During three meetings, Rocha purportedly shared details about his covert activities, expressing pride in his role as a Cuban agent. He used the term “we” to describe Cuba and himself, displaying strong loyalty. Rocha also allegedly referenced being “in charge” during the shooting down of two unarmed planes by Cuba’s intelligence agency in 1996, resulting in four deaths. The former diplomat is additionally accused of providing false information to the US government and making false statements to obtain travel documents.

The US State Department has pledged to collaborate with intelligence agencies to assess any potential long-term national security implications arising from the alleged security breach.

23andMe Confirms Unauthorized Access to 6.9 Million Accounts in Data Breach

23andMe, the ancestry and genetics company, acknowledged on Monday that approximately 14,000 accounts were compromised by “threat actors,” resulting in unauthorized access to the ancestry data of 6.9 million individuals. The breach, first reported by TechCrunch, occurred as hackers exploited reused usernames and passwords obtained from other compromised websites.

While the company initially disclosed the incident in October, the extent of the compromised data was not detailed until now. The accessed information encompasses personal and family details, including DNA-related data such as DNA relatives’ profile information, ancestry reports, and matching DNA segments. Additionally, family tree information, display names, relationship labels, birth years, and self-reported locations were among the compromised data.

In a blog post from October, 23andMe reported the breach but refrained from specifying the extent of the compromised data. The company asserted that it launched an investigation into the matter.

23andMe emphasized that there is no evidence suggesting a breach or data security incident within its systems. The compromised accounts constitute approximately 0.1% of the company’s user base, as indicated in a recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

According to the company, 5.5 million users who opted into the “Relatives” feature, connecting individuals with common DNA, were affected by the breach. An additional 1.4 million users had their family tree information accessed during the unauthorized incident.

Texas Senate Passes Bill to Expedite Resolution of Election Challenges Amidst Controversy

0

The Texas Senate approved a bill on December 1 aimed at expediting the resolution of challenges to the results of constitutional amendment elections. Senator Brian Hughes, R-Mineola, introduced Senate Bill 6 in response to multiple lawsuits disputing the outcomes of the November 7 constitutional amendment election, where Texas voters approved 13 amendments. The proposed legislation seeks to address concerns that unresolved election contests could hinder the certification of results by the governor, preventing the implementation of approved amendments.

The lawsuits allege that voting machines in several Texas counties were not properly certified, a requirement by both the Texas Secretary of State and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. Senate Bill 6, approved by a 23-1 vote, is now on its way to the Texas House, with uncertainty about whether it will be considered before the conclusion of the ongoing special legislative session on December 6.

Breaking down the key provisions of Senate Bill 6, the proposed legislation significantly tightens deadlines for courts to conduct trials and rule on challenges related to constitutional amendment elections. It stipulates that all trials for such challenges must occur within 50 days after the election, with the court having an additional 5 days to issue a ruling. If rulings are appealed to a court of appeals or the Texas Supreme Court, each court is given 30 days to issue a judgment or opinion. These timelines mirror existing ones for challenges to candidate elections and would apply not only to the November 7 election but also to future constitutional amendment elections.

Senator Hughes clarified that the bill does not intend to curtail Texans’ right to challenge elections. Instead, it aims to prompt expedited resolution by courts to ensure timely appeals. Governor Greg Abbott has not included this issue in the special session agenda, but there is a possibility of its consideration if both chambers pass Senate Bill 6. The governor can choose to sign or veto any bills passed by lawmakers.

Responding to the urgency of the situation, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick emphasized the need for a swift resolution before the session’s midweek conclusion. However, Senator Sarah Eckhardt, D-Austin, criticized the lawsuits as recycled allegations and claimed they were based on unfounded claims of election fraud, echoing a broader push for voting restrictions among Texas Republicans.

Katya Ehresman from Common Cause Texas warned against hasty legislative changes, arguing that the lawsuits could be dismissed under existing law. She expressed concern about potential consequences for everyday Texans and urged the legislature not to alter the system prematurely.

As the special legislative session unfolds, it remains uncertain whether the Texas House will vote on Senate Bill 6 before the session’s scheduled conclusion on December 6, as lawmakers left the Capitol on December 1 without taking action on bills. They are set to reconvene next week.

Amazon Eases Holiday Travel Expenses for College Students with $25 Flights

0

In a bid to assist college students in reaching home for the holidays affordably, Amazon’s Prime Student is offering one-way or roundtrip flights for just $25 within the 50 United States. The exclusive offer is available from Dec. 5-7, allowing Prime Student members to book departures between Dec. 8-25 and return flights from Dec. 8 through Jan. 14, 2024. To access these discounted flights, individuals must be subscribed to Amazon’s Prime Student membership tier.

For those not yet enrolled, there’s an opportunity to join Prime Student and take advantage of the 50% discount, reducing the monthly fee to $7.49 (originally $14.99). This special offer extends to current students and anyone aged 18 to 24. Alternatively, opting for an annual subscription further slashes the monthly cost to less than $6.

To secure the $25 student flights, Prime Student members can visit the Prime Student x StudentUniverse page starting at 6 a.m. PST on Tuesday, Dec. 5. A limited quantity of 3,000 tickets will be available during Dec. 5-7, with 1,000 tickets released at 6 a.m. PST Dec. 5, another 1,000 at 12 a.m. PST Dec. 6, and the final batch of 1,000 at 12 a.m. PST Dec. 7.

In the event that the initial 3,000 tickets are claimed swiftly, Prime Student members will still enjoy a $25 discount on flights using a StudentUniverse promo code. With such attractive savings on coast-to-coast flights, students are encouraged to seize the opportunity to spend the holidays with family rather than in dorm rooms with takeout meals. Boarding calls are in session, and families can anticipate the return of their loved ones.

KHOU 11 Houston’s Digital Anchor Brandi Smith Bids Farewell After Eight Years

KHOU 11 Houston bids farewell to one of its beloved personalities as digital anchor Brandi Smith announces her departure after an impactful eight-year tenure with the CBS affiliate. Taking to social media on Saturday, Smith expressed gratitude for the trust placed in her by the Houston community, acknowledging the blessings of her 22-year career. Her final sign-off from the channel occurred on Friday, marking the end of a significant chapter at KHOU 11.

Dispelling any notions of stepping away from journalism or leaving Houston, Smith, with over 300,000 TikTok followers, disclosed her future plans. She hinted at a role as a multimedia journalist covering the Rice University community and urged her audience to “stay tuned” for upcoming ventures. Emphasizing her commitment to sharing Houston’s stories, she reassured that her online presence would persist. Smith conveyed her admiration for the city and its compassionate residents, expressing a desire to continue showcasing their incredible deeds.

Smith joined KHOU 11 in February 2017, contributing to the station in various roles, including morning newscast social media anchor, Saturday morning anchor, and reporter. Her national recognition came in the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey when she heroically rescued a truck driver on live television, earning her an interview on Ellen.

Reflecting on her decision to part ways with KHOU 11, Smith clarified that despite a supportive management and colleagues, the move felt necessary. She shared that a friend informed her about an opportunity at Rice University, aligning with her passion for journalism and allowing her to continue doing what she loves.