The Supreme Court of the United States appeared skeptical Wednesday of former President Donald Trump’s effort to end birthright citizenship, as justices from across the ideological spectrum raised concerns during oral arguments.
Justices Question Constitutionality
At issue is Trump’s executive order seeking to limit automatic citizenship to children born to U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents. Several justices challenged whether that interpretation aligns with the 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to those born in the United States.
Chief Justice John Roberts described parts of the administration’s argument as “quirky,” questioning how narrow historical exceptions could justify broad restrictions.
Legal Precedent Under Scrutiny
The court also examined the landmark United States v. Wong Kim Ark decision, which has long upheld birthright citizenship. Justices raised doubts about the administration’s reliance on selective historical interpretations and definitions of “allegiance.”
Historic Court Appearance
Trump attended the arguments in person—an unprecedented move for a sitting president—though he did not address the court.
What’s Next
A decision is expected by late June. The ruling could have sweeping implications for immigration policy and citizenship rights in the United States.
For more on the birthright citizenship case, stay tuned to Que Onda Magazine.