68.4 F
Houston
Friday, May 8, 2026

Home Blog Page 130

Prince Harry Jokes About Trump and Holiday Movies in Playful ‘Late Show’ Appearance

Prince Harry brought humor, holiday cheer, and a few sharp jabs to The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, surprising audiences with a cameo centered on America’s obsession with Christmas films.

A Holiday Movie “Audition”

The Duke of Sussex walked onstage to a standing ovation as Colbert joked about how unlikely it is to bump into a real prince—unlike the plots of countless Hallmark movies. Harry responded by pretending he was there to audition for The Gingerbread Prince Saves Christmas in Nebraska, a fictional holiday movie he claimed Americans would love.

When Colbert asked why he’d even want the role, Harry teased, “You’re obsessed with royalty. I heard you elected a king,” taking a playful swipe at President Donald Trump.

Harry Leans Into the Bit

Determined to “audition,” Harry joked he’d do “anything,” including recording a self-tape or “settling a baseless lawsuit with the White House”—a nod to the real $16 million Trump–Paramount settlement over a defamation dispute involving 60 Minutes and Kamala Harris.

Colbert replied that he never had to do any of that to get on TV, prompting Harry’s punchline: “Maybe that’s why you’re canceled,” referencing CBS’s decision to end The Late Show in May 2026.

A Mock Hallmark Ending

The pair continued the holiday parody as the set transformed into a snowy backdrop. In true rom-com fashion, Colbert declared Harry had earned the part, crowning him the show’s “official prince of Christmas.”

They later filmed a social media skit together, lip-syncing a viral Great British Bake Off soundbite about being “king for a day,” with Harry playing the host and Colbert the contestant.

Behind the Late-Night Drama

CBS’s 2026 cancellation of The Late Show, combined with Paramount’s settlement with Trump, has sparked criticism and accusations of political pressure—especially as Paramount sought approval for its merger with Skydance Media.

For more celebrity stories, stay tuned to Que Onda Magazine.

Man Arrested in Florida in 1997 Killings of Woman and Toddler Linked to Long Island Cold Case

0

Nearly three decades after the deaths of a woman and her 2-year-old daughter—cases long associated with the Gilgo Beach serial murder investigations—authorities have arrested the man now accused of killing them.

Cold Case Break Leads to Arrest

Andrew Dykes, 66, was taken into custody near Tampa, Florida, on Wednesday on a warrant issued by Nassau County, New York, according to law enforcement sources. He appeared before a Florida judge Thursday and is facing murder charges in the death of Tanya Jackson.

Jackson was 26 years old when her dismembered remains were discovered in Lakeview, Long Island, in June 1997. Her daughter, Tatiana, was found 14 years later in 2011 near Gilgo Beach—the same area used as a dumping ground by suspected serial killer Rex Heuermann.

Victims Known for Years Only as “Peaches” and “Baby Doe”

For decades, investigators did not know their names. Jackson was identified only as “Peaches,” a nickname based on a tattoo on her body. Her daughter was labeled “Baby Doe.” Their true identities were finally confirmed earlier this year, prompting authorities to offer a $25,000 reward for information in the case.

Connection to the Gilgo Beach Investigation

Tatiana’s remains were found near the stretch of Long Island’s southern shore where multiple other victims were recovered, fueling speculation that their deaths could be linked to the Gilgo Beach serial killer.

Rex Heuermann, a Long Island architect arrested in 2023, has been charged with killing seven women. He has pleaded not guilty. Heuermann was never charged in the deaths of Jackson or her daughter, and investigators have not publicly tied him to these murders.

For more on this story, stay tuned to Que Onda Magazine.

Grand Jury Rejects DOJ Bid to Revive Fraud Case Against New York AG Letitia James

0

A federal grand jury in Norfolk, Virginia, has rejected the Department of Justice’s attempt to refile mortgage-fraud charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James, according to sources familiar with the proceedings. The decision comes just ten days after a federal judge dismissed the original indictment due to the unlawful appointment of the U.S. attorney who brought the case.

Extraordinary Rebuff to DOJ

Federal prosecutors were unable to persuade a majority of grand jurors that James misled a bank to secure better mortgage terms on a property she purchased in 2020. The grand jury issued a “no true bill,” effectively blocking the case and delivering a rare public rebuke of the DOJ’s efforts to prosecute James—one of President Donald Trump’s most outspoken critics.

The move follows months of political tension. Trump had directly urged the prosecution of James and other perceived adversaries, and his former attorney and aide, Lindsey Halligan, secured the original indictment in October before her appointment was ruled unlawful.

James Responds: “Baseless Charges”

In a statement, James expressed gratitude to grand jurors:
“As I have said from the start, the charges against me are baseless. It is time for this unchecked weaponization of our justice system to stop.”

Prosecutors had claimed James falsely labeled the property as a second home rather than an investment, potentially saving about $19,000 over the life of the loan. But investigators reportedly found evidence that undermined key portions of the original indictment.

Legal Fallout from Dismissed Appointments

U.S. District Judge Cameron Currie tossed out the earlier cases against both James and former FBI Director James Comey, ruling that Halligan had no legal authority to serve as U.S. attorney. As a result, all actions she took—including indictments—were invalidated.

It remains unclear whether prosecutors will attempt once more to charge Comey over allegations of false statements to Congress. Both Comey and James have accused the Justice Department of pursuing politically motivated prosecutions ordered directly by Trump, challenges that could factor heavily into any future legal proceedings.

For more on this story, stay tuned to Que Onda Magazine.

¡Que Onda! Magazine Houston – edición 1339

Reach Out to Lopez Law Firm

For legal support, Lopez encourages contacting his firm via 713-529-0220 or visiting jslopez.com.

His team is available 24/7 to assist with serious injury cases, ensuring every client receives skilled representation and compassionate guidance.

A Message to the Community

In English and Spanish, Lopez says: “We are here to serve our clients and our community. Your rights matter, and we will fight for you.”

Jose Lopez exemplifies professional excellence and heartfelt community service, making him a trusted advocate and pillar of Houston.

To connect with attorney Jose Lopez on social media, follow and subscribe @AttorneyLopezTX @AbogadoLopezTX on Instagram, Jose S. Lopez on Facebook or Attorney Lopez TX on YouTube

CDC Vaccine Advisory Committee to Debate Hepatitis B Birth Dose and Childhood Immunization Schedule

0

A High-Stakes Meeting Under New Leadership

The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices meets Thursday and Friday to review major vaccine policies, including the hepatitis B birth dose and the broader childhood vaccine schedule. This is ACIP’s third meeting since Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. removed all 17 previous members and replaced them with his own appointees, several of whom have expressed skepticism toward established vaccine guidance.

Pediatric cardiologist and former Air Force flight surgeon Dr. Kirk Milhoan will chair the meeting, as former chair Martin Kulldorff has taken a permanent role within HHS.

What’s on the Agenda

A draft agenda shows that ACIP will spend the first day discussing the hepatitis B vaccine, including a scheduled vote that experts believe will address whether newborns should continue receiving the shot within 24 hours of birth. The second day will focus on the childhood and adolescent immunization schedule, adjuvants, and vaccine risk monitoring.

Public health leaders say nearly every topic raised is cause for alarm, given the current panel’s departure from long-standing scientific consensus.

Debate Over the Hepatitis B Birth Dose

The CDC currently recommends that all newborns receive the first dose of the hepatitis B vaccine within the first day of life—a practice credited with virtually eliminating infant hepatitis B infections in the U.S.

However, signals from the new ACIP suggest the committee may consider weakening or reversing the universal birth-dose recommendation. Earlier this year, Kulldorff questioned whether vaccinating all newborns was “wise,” and Kennedy has repeatedly made false claims linking the hepatitis B shot to autism.

Former CDC official Dr. Fiona Havers warned that shifting to a “screen the mother only” approach, used prior to the universal policy, would lead to more infants and children contracting hepatitis B. She emphasized that babies can be infected not only by their mothers but also by caregivers or community members who may not know they carry the virus.

According to Havers, any infections caused by delayed or missed vaccination would be “avoidable tragedies,” potentially leading to chronic disease, liver failure, or liver cancer later in life.

Reviewing the Childhood Immunization Schedule

The second day of the meeting will examine the national vaccine schedule for children and adolescents. Two ACIP work groups formed this year are evaluating the cumulative effects of vaccines and reviewing older immunizations that have not been reassessed in more than seven years.

Kennedy has publicly claimed that children receive “92 doses” of vaccines today, compared with three during his childhood. Pediatric experts say the real number is closer to 30 doses, reflecting decades of scientific progress and the addition of vaccines for once-devastating illnesses.

Former CDC acting director Dr. Richard Besser said he has not heard concerns from pediatricians or vaccine experts about the safety of the schedule. He warned that approaching the review with an assumption that the schedule is unsafe “really, really worries me.”

Adjuvants and Misinformation

ACIP will also discuss vaccine adjuvants and contaminants. Kennedy has previously called aluminum adjuvants “neurotoxins,” despite decades of research showing they safely boost immune responses. The CDC notes that adjuvants have been used safely in vaccines for more than 70 years.

A Pivotal Moment for U.S. Vaccine Policy

Since being restructured, ACIP has already recommended against thimerosal-containing flu vaccines and narrowed guidance for the MMRV combination shot—moves that experts say are not supported by evidence and may weaken public confidence.

As the committee weighs further changes, public health officials fear the consequences could ripple far beyond the meeting room, reshaping long-established protections against preventable diseases.

For more on this story, stay tuned to Que Onda Magazine.

Amazon Considers Breaking From USPS and Expanding Its Own Delivery Network

0

A Major Shift Under Review

Amazon is reportedly weighing a major overhaul of its Prime delivery system, including the possibility of ending its longtime partnership with the U.S. Postal Service. The move, first reported by The Washington Post, would mark one of the biggest logistics shakeups in years and could reshape how millions of packages reach customers across the country.

Amazon declined detailed comment, and USPS said it had “no comment at this time.”

Why It Matters

The Postal Service, already struggling with financial challenges, relies heavily on Amazon as its largest customer—bringing in more than $6 billion in revenue in 2025. A split could create deep budget strains for USPS and further strengthen Amazon’s dominance in the delivery and e-commerce space.

Industry experts warn that no other client could replace Amazon’s volume, making the potential separation a threat to the agency’s stability.

What Amazon Is Exploring

Sources familiar with the discussions say Amazon may phase out its multi-billion-dollar USPS delivery contract by late 2026. The Postal Service currently handles millions of Amazon’s last-mile deliveries across urban, suburban, and rural regions—coverage Amazon cannot yet match on its own.

Amazon has confirmed that USPS remains a “long-standing and trusted partner,” but the company says it is evaluating all options to guarantee reliable service. Talks to renew the current contract have stalled, partly due to USPS’ move toward a reverse-auction pricing model, which Amazon described as a “surprising” shift.

Amazon’s Rapid-Delivery Experiments

As negotiations continue, Amazon is simultaneously testing new logistics approaches aimed at ultrafast delivery. Among them:

  • Amazon Now, a pilot offering 30-minute delivery of groceries and household essentials in parts of Seattle and Philadelphia
  • A network of micro-fulfillment centers
  • Gig-based delivery drivers
  • A $3.99 per-order fee for Prime members

Amazon says it delivered more than 9 billion items in a single day in 2024, reflecting the vast scale of its evolving system.

What Experts Are Saying

Industry analysts say the stakes are monumental. Leo Raymond of Mailers Hub warned that USPS cannot easily replace Amazon’s volume, while Amazon has the power to disrupt competitors like UPS and FedEx if it expands fully into last-mile delivery.

Elena Patel, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said that if a major partner like Amazon builds its own nationwide system, “that is a fundamental threat to the Postal Service.”

Amazon spokesperson Steve Kelly echoed that the company is reviewing “all of our options” to maintain dependable delivery for customers.

What Comes Next

Amazon’s contract with USPS expires in October 2026. A final decision has not been made, though Amazon CEO Andy Jassy and Postmaster General David Steiner met virtually in November. A renewed agreement remains possible.

If Amazon opts for a fully independent delivery network, the company would face steep investments in vehicles, personnel, and regulatory compliance. Consumers could see changes in delivery times, costs, or service availability—especially in rural areas where USPS currently provides essential coverage.

For USPS, losing Amazon could mean deeper financial turmoil and renewed pressure on Congress to intervene or restructure the agency’s business model.

For more business news, stay tuned to Que Onda Magazine.

Texas Set to Enforce New ‘Bathroom Bill’ Under SB 8

What SB 8 Does

Beginning Dec. 4, Texas will implement Senate Bill 8, also known as the Texas Women’s Privacy Act. The law restricts transgender people’s access to certain restrooms, showers, and changing rooms in government-owned buildings. These include:

  • County and city properties
  • State agency buildings
  • Public schools and charter schools
  • Public universities

Private businesses, such as restaurants, are not affected and may set their own restroom policies.

Exceptions Under the Law

SB 8 makes specific allowances for entering facilities that don’t align with one’s sex assigned at birth. These include:

  • Emergency medical assistance
  • Custodial, maintenance, or inspection duties
  • Law enforcement purposes
  • People helping someone who needs assistance
  • Children 9 or younger accompanied by an adult

Institutions may still offer single-user restrooms open to anyone.

Additional Rules for Prisons and Shelters

Two areas receive separate requirements:

Texas prisons: The Texas Department of Criminal Justice must classify housing based on sex assigned at birth. Officials say they already do so for the roughly 1,750 trans inmates in custody.

Family violence shelters: Shelters designed specifically for female victims may only serve those assigned female at birth and the victims’ children under 18. However, advocates note many shelters receive federal grants that require services for all survivors regardless of sex, suggesting SB 8 may not apply to most facilities.

Concerns Over Enforcement

The law instructs institutions to take “every reasonable step” to ensure compliance but provides no clear enforcement rules. This lack of guidance has raised alarms among civil rights groups who fear:

  • Harassment in public spaces
  • Over-surveillance
  • Requests for identification
  • Potential physical inspections

Although Sen. Mayes Middleton called physical inspections “extreme examples” during debate, SB 8 does not explicitly prohibit them.

Government entities are now drafting their own policies, while others say they already meet the law’s requirements and expect no major changes.

Penalties Target Institutions — Not Individuals

Individuals who use a restroom that doesn’t match their sex assigned at birth are not fined or prosecuted under SB 8. Instead, penalties fall on the public institution responsible for the facility.

The enforcement process works as follows:

  1. A Texas resident must first submit a written complaint to the agency where a violation occurred.
  2. The agency has three days to fix the issue.
  3. If unresolved, the Attorney General’s Office may investigate.
  4. Institutions with verified violations have 15 more days to comply.
  5. Fines begin at $25,000 for the first violation and $125,000 per day for each subsequent one.

Additionally, individuals “affected” by an institution’s failure to enforce the law can file lawsuits seeking court orders to force compliance.

For more on this story, stay tuned to Que Onda Magazine.

College Student Deported Despite Judge’s Order

A Sudden Arrest at the Airport

Any Lucia Lopez Belloza, a 19-year-old college freshman, says she was living her “American Dream” before immigration officers detained her at Boston Logan International Airport the week before Thanksgiving. She had planned to fly to Texas to surprise her parents for the holidays. Instead, she was handcuffed, questioned, and deported to Honduras—despite a federal judge’s order blocking her removal.

“I burst into tears because I couldn’t believe it,” she told ABC News from Honduras. “I had to spend the night sleeping on the floor.”

Judge Ordered Her Not to Be Removed

Court documents show that a judge ordered federal authorities not to deport or transfer Lopez Belloza outside Massachusetts within hours of her detainment. Yet she was flown to a Texas detention center that same night and deported the next day.

“How does it feel to know you were deported despite a judge saying you should not be?” ABC News asked.
“It feels unfair,” she said. “Why did everything happen so fast, within three days?”

DHS Cites Old Removal Order

A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said Lopez Belloza had a 2015 removal order issued when she was a child, claiming she “illegally stayed in the country since.” Lopez Belloza said she had no idea such an order existed.

DHS pointed to a voluntary return program offering migrants a free flight home and a $1,000 stipend—an option she was never told about during her arrest.

A Family Caught Off Guard

Lopez Belloza had hoped to surprise her parents in Texas with a holiday visit. Instead, she was deported to Honduras, a country she has not seen since arriving in the U.S. at age 8.

“They didn’t know I was at the airport,” she said. “I thought the surprise would be me coming home—not me getting arrested.”

Her family, she said, believes the deportation is deeply unjust, noting she has no criminal record and has been focused entirely on her education.

Dreams Interrupted

The freshman said she had earned strong financial aid and secured a spot at a college that believed in her.

“My dream was to be in college and be one of the first in my family to do it,” she said. “It felt like—wow—I’m doing this.”

Part of a Larger Crackdown

Her case comes as the Trump administration carries out an aggressive immigration enforcement effort that has already removed more than half a million migrants, with another 1.6 million choosing to self-deport.

Message to the President

Asked what she would say to President Donald Trump, Lopez Belloza responded:
“Why is he getting people who are living in the United States working day and night? People like me, who are in college, doing their dreams, having an education?”

For more on the impact of Trump’s administration immigration crackdown, stay tuned to Que Onda Magazine.

Another cold front blows in more damp and dreary weather

0

HOUSTON, Texas (KTRK) — Rain clouds are spreading into Southeast Texas again, and we are in for a wet, windy, and cold finish to the work week.

Numerous showers and an isolated thunderstorm will be possible on Thursday as a cold front moves through. Temperatures will hover in the 50s for most during the morning, but a building north breeze will push readings into the 40s through the day. While the radar may look quiet at times on Thursday, patches of drizzle and mist will continue, keeping the streets fairly wet throughout the day.

Any severe weather expected with this next rainy system?

Not at this time, but a severe hailstorm cannot be completely ruled out. Brief heavy rainfall, thunder, and lightning may wake the family up overnight, but after the cold front clears the coast, it’s mainly just rain after that.

How long will the rain chances and clouds stick around this time?

The rain chances will linger all the way into Saturday morning, and we won’t completely shake the clouds until sometime on Sunday. Thursday won’t be a washout, but there’s a 60% chance you’ll get some rain off and on through the day under an overcast sky. It now looks like Friday will be equally rain, except even colder. Widespread showers are most likely during the first half of the day with temperatures generally stuck in the 40s all day. Drier air eventually blows in on Saturday, but there’s still a 20% chance you’ll catch some rain from a lingering showers in the morning, especially in our coastal counties.

How much rain should we expect to get?

We expect 1-2″ of rain to be fairly common in Southeast Texas with the 2″ totals more likely in our coastal counties.

When could we get our first freeze?

We have no freezing weather in our forecast over the next 10 days, and long range signals indicate we probably have to wait until the second half of December for a chance of freezing weather in Houston. On average, Houston historically gets its first freeze during the second week of December.d

13 ALERT RADAR MAPS:
Southeast Texas
Houston
Harris County
Galveston County
Montgomery/Walker/San Jacinto/Polk/Grimes Counties
Fort Bend/Wharton/Colorado Counties
Brazoria/Matagorda Counties

This story comes from our news partner ABC13 Houston.

For more Houston headlines, stay tuned to Que Onda Magazine!

Trump Sparks Outrage After Calling Somali Immigrants ‘Garbage’

President Donald Trump drew widespread condemnation Tuesday after referring to Somali immigrants as “garbage” during a Cabinet meeting, escalating tensions with Minnesota officials and Rep. Ilhan Omar.

Remarks Target Somali Community and Rep. Ilhan Omar

Trump claimed the nation was “at a tipping point” and argued the U.S. was “going to go the wrong way if we keep taking in garbage into our country.” He used the same slur for Rep. Omar, who responded online, calling Trump’s fixation on her “creepy” and urging him to “get the help he desperately needs.”

The comments sharply contrasted with Trump’s outreach to Somali voters during his 2024 reelection campaign, when he praised their desire for “safety and security.”

Backdrop: Fraud Allegations and Political Feud

The remarks came amid a political clash between Trump and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz following a New York Times report alleging years of fraud within parts of Minnesota’s Somali community. Critics claimed state leaders hesitated to act out of fear of alienating Somali voters.

Walz pushed back, saying he supports prosecution of crime but criticized “indiscriminately targeting immigrants” as a political stunt. House Oversight Chair James Comer has since launched an investigation, seeking documents from Walz and Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison.

Minnesota Leaders Defend Somali Residents

Minneapolis officials rejected Trump’s rhetoric, noting the city’s Somali population—more than 80,000 strong—is largely made up of U.S. citizens. Mayor Jacob Frey warned that intensified ICE enforcement could result in wrongful arrests of American citizens.

City Council Member Jamal Osman criticized the administration for “othering” Somali Americans. “Our Somali American neighbors deserve to feel safe in their own country,” he said.

ICE Activity Expected to Increase

Federal border czar Tom Homan confirmed Tuesday that ICE operations in Minnesota will ramp up but offered no timeline. The escalation follows increasing anti-immigrant language from Trump, including references to the recent shooting of two National Guard members in Washington, D.C., allegedly by an Afghan national.

A Community Under Scrutiny

Somali Americans, many of whom arrived as refugees following the 1990s civil war, now number more than 260,000 nationwide. Census data shows about 73% are naturalized citizens.

As federal scrutiny intensifies and political rhetoric rises, Minnesota leaders emphasize that they will continue standing with the state’s Somali community—and push back against efforts to paint citizens and neighbors as threats.

For more on this story, stay tuned to Que Onda Magazine.